Ls1 Camaro Ss Vs ‘68 Mustang 302
Please help support our BBQ/Car Show this weekend by donating. Every little bit helps and a little something is better than nothing. Please paypal our event coordinator Nam @ namngo910@yahoo.com w…
Ls1 Camaro Ss Vs ‘68 Mustang 302
Related Posts10 ResponsesComments(10)Trackbacks(0) |
You obvisouly dont know how much horsepower an lsx motor has
November 12, 2009 1:03 am | #1yeah your bros car would beat them… not you.
November 12, 2009 2:02 am | #2and whats your point…..
November 12, 2009 2:35 am | #3no need to brag about your bros car for him
November 12, 2009 2:56 am | #4this camaro doesn’t have an LT1, it has an LS1… aluminum block i believe, anyways… i dont like GM but the camaro six speed is worth getting because of the MPG on hw.
November 12, 2009 3:34 am | #5the 302 in this stang might be a boss 302 if thats the case, its pretty much stock, its not a 5.0l or 4.6, more like a 7.1l. those 68 boss 302 motors were made for one thing, dusting 68 roadrunner 440 hemi’s.
November 12, 2009 4:27 am | #6How is a stock boss 302 a 7.1 liter? That makes no sense. If it was stock it would be a 5 Liter, And it wouldn’t run anywhere close to a LSX. a 69 Boss 302 was a mid 14 second car.
November 12, 2009 4:43 am | #7haha… wow dude, your an idiot. im not sure how many cubes are in a 7.1 but im sure its not 302, something like 427. 5.0 (302Ci)
November 12, 2009 5:06 am | #8A boss 302 was a four bolt main 302 cubic inch motor with 351 Cleavland heads on it. It was a 5.0 liter engine.
November 12, 2009 5:10 am | #9LMFAO!
November 12, 2009 5:14 am | #10