RSS
 

Ls1 Camaro Ss Vs ‘68 Mustang 302

12 Nov


Please help support our BBQ/Car Show this weekend by donating. Every little bit helps and a little something is better than nothing. Please paypal our event coordinator Nam @ namngo910@yahoo.com w…

 

Tags: ,

  1. incisionpunk

    November 12, 2009 at 1:03 am

    You obvisouly dont know how much horsepower an lsx motor has

     
  2. generationkid

    November 12, 2009 at 2:02 am

    yeah your bros car would beat them… not you.

     
  3. Antibacterialspray01

    November 12, 2009 at 2:35 am

    and whats your point…..

     
  4. generationkid

    November 12, 2009 at 2:56 am

    no need to brag about your bros car for him

     
  5. generationkid

    November 12, 2009 at 3:34 am

    this camaro doesn’t have an LT1, it has an LS1… aluminum block i believe, anyways… i dont like GM but the camaro six speed is worth getting because of the MPG on hw.

     
  6. 34D2234

    November 12, 2009 at 4:27 am

    the 302 in this stang might be a boss 302 if thats the case, its pretty much stock, its not a 5.0l or 4.6, more like a 7.1l. those 68 boss 302 motors were made for one thing, dusting 68 roadrunner 440 hemi’s.

     
  7. sniper1334

    November 12, 2009 at 4:43 am

    How is a stock boss 302 a 7.1 liter? That makes no sense. If it was stock it would be a 5 Liter, And it wouldn’t run anywhere close to a LSX. a 69 Boss 302 was a mid 14 second car.

     
  8. generationkid

    November 12, 2009 at 5:06 am

    haha… wow dude, your an idiot. im not sure how many cubes are in a 7.1 but im sure its not 302, something like 427. 5.0 (302Ci)

     
  9. venomfastback

    November 12, 2009 at 5:10 am

    A boss 302 was a four bolt main 302 cubic inch motor with 351 Cleavland heads on it. It was a 5.0 liter engine.

     
  10. Antibacterialspray01

    November 12, 2009 at 5:14 am

    LMFAO!