Comments on: Ls1 Camaro Ss Vs ‘68 Mustang 302

By: Antibacterialspray01

Antibacterialspray01 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:57:45 +0000

LMFAO!ï»¿

By: venomfastback

venomfastback — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:06 +0000

A boss 302 was a four bolt main 302 cubic inch motor with 351ï»¿ Cleavland heads on it. It was a 5.0 liter engine.

By: generationkid

generationkid — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:47:15 +0000

haha… wow dude, your an idiot. im not sure how many cubes are inï»¿ a 7.1 but im sure its not 302, something like 427. 5.0 (302Ci)

By: sniper1334

sniper1334 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:46:25 +0000

How is a stock boss 302 a 7.1 liter? That makes no sense. If it was stock it would be a 5 Liter, And it wouldn’t run anywhere close to a LSX. a 69 Boss 302ï»¿ was a mid 14 second car.

By: 34D2234

34D2234 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:31:40 +0000

the 302 in this stang mightï»¿ be a boss 302 if thats the case, its pretty much stock, its not a 5.0l or 4.6, more like a 7.1l. those 68 boss 302 motors were made for one thing, dusting 68 roadrunner 440 hemi’s.

By: generationkid

generationkid — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:19:46 +0000

this camaro doesn’t have an LT1, it has an LS1… aluminum block i believe, anyways… i dont like GM but the camaro six speed is worth gettingï»¿ because of the MPG on hw.

By: generationkid

generationkid — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:12:45 +0000

no need to brag about your brosï»¿ car for him

By: Antibacterialspray01

Antibacterialspray01 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:08:05 +0000

and whatsï»¿ your point…..

By: generationkid

generationkid — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:31:21 +0000

yeah your bros car would beat them… not you.ï»¿

By: incisionpunk

incisionpunk — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:47:24 +0000

You obvisouly dont know how much horsepower an lsx motor hasï»¿